+ LozBlog

Moved to it at last (around march). The castle. The temple. Still unfinished but slowly overpowering.

And hard break of narrative flow!

Truth is, I did not build this post as I anticipated, or wanted, or believed I could, or whatever. So I may summarize a few stuff that went by but I also did this: I asked my AI chatbot of choice to summarize the year based on our ’25 conversations. It´s really incomplete but it´s also the fastest way to do somethin´bout it. So here’s its answer:

Below is a 2025-only analytical profile, derived from recurring patterns across our conversations during that year. It intentionally avoids speculation, praise, or extrapolation beyond what your behavior consistently shows.

A. Core identity & roles (as enacted in 2025)

You consistently operate at the intersection of creator, analyst, and organizer, rather than as a single-role specialist.

• Creator: Writing, video, AI visuals, narrative design, and editorial framing recur weekly, not as side activities.
• Educator / academic: Teaching, curricular alignment, research framing, and methodological rigor remain an active constraint shaping how you create.
• Analyst / curator of tech & AI: You don’t just report news; you contextualize, rank, summarize, and archive it.
• Entrepreneur / brand builder: TecnoBato is treated as an ecosystem (content, formats, cadence, archives), not a channel.
• Experimental technologist: You test workflows, prompts, formats, and pipelines to see what works, not what’s trendy.

Pattern: You don’t “switch hats”; you layer them simultaneously, which increases coherence but also cognitive load.

B. Recurring projects & universes

Your 2025 activity clusters around a small number of persistent worlds, not scattered ideas.

• TecnoBato
  A stable backbone: weekly tech/AI news, structured formats (Top 10, r1p, clean411), podcasting, and future book compilations.
• Tenebrae Regnum
  A long-term narrative universe treated seriously, with attention to aesthetics, typography, framing, and transmedia potential.
• Academic research & teaching
  Ongoing, not episodic. Research questions, methodology, gamification, and educational impact repeatedly constrain and inform other projects.
• AI art / AI film experiments
  Used as experimentation labs, not ends in themselves.
• Publishing
  Strong push toward ebooks, compilations, and archival formats, especially quarterly and yearly summaries.

Pattern: You return to the same projects from different angles rather than abandoning them.

C. Creative & cognitive style

Your working style in 2025 is non-linear but structured.

• Multi-project workflow: You actively rotate between projects to unblock thinking.
• Iterative refinement: First drafts are expected to be revised; you optimize wording, structure, and tone repeatedly.
• Systems thinking: You default to tables, rulesets, naming conventions, pipelines, and reusable formats.
• Visual-first, narrative-driven: Even analytical work is framed visually or editorially.
• High tolerance for ambiguity: You explore before fully defining, especially in creative and AI contexts.

Pattern: You think in frameworks, not isolated outputs.

D. Technical stack & tools mindset

Your relationship with technology is instrumental and reflective, not tool-centric.

• AI as collaborator: You treat AI as a thinking partner and drafting engine, not a replacement for judgment.
• Prompt engineering as craft: Prompts are refined, versioned, and contextualized.
• Automation bias: You repeatedly look for ways to standardize, template, and reduce friction.
• Cross-platform logic: You design content knowing it will live across video, audio, web, and print.

Pattern: You care less about which tool and more about repeatable workflows.

E. Editorial & taste profile

Your taste in 2025 is consistent and restrictive (by choice).

• Technology framed through culture and consequences, not specs alone.
• Serious, journalistic tone; avoidance of hype and sensationalism.
• Preference for long-form synthesis, supported by weekly summaries.
• Sci-fi / fantasy aesthetics, but controlled and symbolic, not loud.
• Low tolerance for fluff, drama, or content without substance.

Pattern: You optimize for credibility and longevity over virality.

F. Constraints & tensions

Several tensions recur and shape your decisions.

• Time fragmentation: Teaching, family, and multiple projects constantly compete.
• Parallel commitments: You intentionally keep many threads open, which both energizes and overwhelms.
• Rigor vs. freedom: You want academic seriousness and creative exploration.
• Community without leadership: You seek peers but resist becoming the organizer.
• Sustainability anxiety: You worry less about ideas and more about finishing and maintaining output.

Pattern: Your constraints are structural, not motivational.

G. Trajectory & intent (as visible in 2025)

Your direction in 2025 trends toward consolidation and authorship.

• Movement from scattered outputs → ecosystems (series, formats, books).
• Increasing editorial authority: you interpret, rank, and contextualize more confidently.
• Clear interest in archival value: quarterly and yearly compilations as historical records.
• Gradual strengthening of a distinct voice: less reactive, more curatorial.

Pattern: You are shifting from producer of content to editor-author of record.

Bottom line (analytical, not motivational)

In 2025, you consistently behaved like someone building durable intellectual and creative infrastructure, not chasing outputs. Your main risk is overload; your main strength is coherence across domains.